To dehumanize someone does not
actually change this person’s status as human. In fact, dehumanization can
happen without someone’s knowledge or consent. When a person marginalizes
someone, it provides this person with an internal excuse or justification to
continue such behavior. To Martin Luther King Jr. this was the root of the
problem during the civil rights movement. The majority of white Americans who could sympathize with
the plight of African Americans placed themselves as bystanders and saw African Americans as separate from themselves. To the bystanders, this was
a problem that would eventually work itself out. Kolvenbach, however, urges
against these feelings. Under the Jesuit tradition, all humans are seen with
dignity. In this way, Kolvenbach urging Jesuits to promote the service of all
people speaks to King’s mission. Regardless of distance, race, or social
standing, every person deserves to be treated with dignity.
Although the equal treatment of all humans seems like a
reasonable idea to promote, Kolvenbach and King are both considered radical.
They are radical in that they challenge long-standing traditions and social
norms. Even Kolvenbach, who addresses other Jesuits, was met with contention.
Once set in their ways, people can be hard to move. It is here that seeing
victims of injustice as separate from us or unworthy of just treatment is
particularly dangerous. Traditions of injustice leave the oppressors in the
majority. In this way, inactivity
can be excused. Change is seen as trouble as opposed to solution and those who
stand on the sidelines can neither be blamed for acting in malice nor for
rousing conflict.
King and Kolvenbach clearly state
that such passive behavior will not be tolerated. King powerfully writes,
“Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.” Such
“lukewarm acceptance” is exactly what we see from Huck Finn in his interactions
with Jim. In comparison to the other white characters in the story, Huck treats
Jim with a respect that others would never consider. In reality, however, Huck
never really sees or treats Jim as a human being. Huck certainly enjoys Jim,
but Jim’s desire for freedom, as Jane Smiley points out in “Say It Ain’t So,
Huck”, is never taken seriously by Huck. Huck never does any explicit harm to
Jim, but he also does not strive to bring justice to Jim. Huck turns into a
bystander, bearing witness to the injustice done unto Jim. While Tom turns the
freeing of Jim into a game, Huck does not quite agree, but does not go so far
as to stop Tom’s careless use of a man’s life as a game. Huck believes that Jim
should not be sent to New Orleans, but is unwilling to act in rebellion to free
him.
Both Huck and Tom are much like the
“white moderates” that King condemns for their inaction. They both essentially
agree with Jim’s plight, but shy away from truly helping him, which would stir
up trouble. They stop short of being radically humane. They, like the “white
moderates”, believe that Jim’s time will eventually come. They do not know and
cannot understand what it is like to be owned as Jim is. In denying Jim’s
qualification as human, the inactivity of Huck and Tom, however, is excused.
The bystander effect is not a
distant concept for modern society. People easily distance themselves from
contentious situations, therefore removing victims from their plane of
responsibility. This is, in some ways, a dehumanization of the victim. By
choosing to stand back and refuse action, the bystander, in any scenario,
claims that the victim is unworthy of justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment