Harriet Deer and Irving Deer in “Satire as Rhetorical Play”
along with O’Reilley present a promising solution to this prophecy of
self-destruction. Words, like the words written under Michael Jordan in my
boyfriends room, have a potential that is for many people untapped. Literature
is a way for people to see war and the horrors it brings without actually
experiencing it personally. For Deer and Deer, satire accomplishes this
particularly well because it implicates the audience, forcing a reaction and
decision from the audience. They write, “Repeated satirical probing…display
every work, genre, and convention as no more than a process, [art of all the
processes by which human beings try through art to stretch their
consciousnesses, to engage more of themselves in more of life.” In reading and
understanding satire, we, as the audience, open ourselves up to a greater
consciousness. In this, we are able to come closer to understanding our
limitations as humans and foreseeing the potential problems of the future. In
this way, “artists – all artists – should be treasured as alarm systems
(Vonnegut). Through the arts, humans have the chance to bridge the gap between our own consciousness and the dangerous abilities we have given ourselves through technology.
Monday, March 17, 2014
Soaring Too High
While reading “The Peaceable Classroom” by Mary Rose
O’Reilley, I was immediately reminded of William Blake’s oft misused quote: “No
bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings.” In my boyfriend’s room
there is a poster of this quote under Michael Jordan’s outspread arms and I
cannot help but be annoyed at the use of such powerful words to describe
basketball. Words like this, according to O’Reilley, are the sorts of things
that change people’s minds about war. The reason her essay brought Blake to
mind was her mention of the Gatling gun. This was a gun, one of her students
said, that made it “possible to kill too many people” (O’Reilley 107). With the invention of this technology
and others like it, we have given ourselves power beyond what is natural or
appropriate. We do not (yet) have a consciousness to control our own creations.
Once we become go “over to the side of the machine” (O’Reilley 107), the
senseless killing of war becomes not only more possible, but also more acceptable.
In removing the human factor and replacing it with technology, we lose control
over what we are capable of.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment