The most ubiquitous of these is “so it goes,” which is
stated every time a person’s death is mentioned. No matter the circumstances of
the death, this phrase emphasizes the futility of resistance and echoes the
Tralfamadorian view that free will is an illusion. Whether the death is
peaceful and comes in old age or is the result of brutal violence, there is no
avoiding it. The phrase offers an unbiased explanation of death. It does not
try to rationalize death or attach meaning to it. Instead, it poses is as
unavoidable and routine. This is, technically, a true argument. It is
troubling, however, when “so it goes” refers to a case of inexcusable violence
or brutality. Edgar Derby’s execution, for example, comes as a punishment for
stealing a teapot after surviving the bombing of Dresden. His death is
senseless and tragic, but is still met with the phrase. In a way, this act is
excused because this is how things were going to happen any way. Derby was
going to die by execution regardless of human action and the executioners are
pardoned for their brutality in the name of fate.
“Um” is Billy Pilgrim’s response to this Tralfamadorian
logic. In a conversation with a Tralfamadorian, Billy Pilgrim is told that
avoiding war is futile, just like avoiding death is. War is merely the way of
the world and there is nothing to be done to stop it. In an attempt to comfort
Pilgrim, the Tralfamadorian says, “’That’s one thing Earthlings might learn to
do, if they tried hard enough: Ignore the awful times, and concentrate on the
good ones.’ ‘Um,’ said Billy Pilgrim” (Vonnegut 117). In the face of Tralfamadorian passive acceptance of even the
ugliest parts of life, Billy Pilgrim does not seem satisfied. Although “um” is
a remarkably non-committal response, it does signal at least a questioning of
what the Tralfamadorian has said. If “so it goes” represents the idea that war
is an unavoidable and natural aspect of human life, then “um” represents the
hope that maybe things can change. “Um,” in its quiet disapproval, states that
there is a desire to not live and relive the horrors of war and demands that
people be held accountable for their own brutality.
As these two phrases are repeated throughout the book, their
opposition, originally unclear, becomes starker. Although it can be comforting
to accept an inevitability in both death and war, the removal of free will and
therefore personal responsibility is worrisome to say the least. In the face of
tragedy, it is sometimes easier to turn to ideologies like “so it goes,” like “everything
happens for a reason.” Some things are too terrible to rationalize or
understand, but there is certainly danger in defaulting to a position of
passivity. In the case of Edgar Derby, fate is not to blame. This injustice can
be attributed only to the fault of the men involved. This is not how things
should simply “go.” Instead, such brutality should make us stop and say “um…”
No comments:
Post a Comment